Academic Exchange Quarterly  Fall 2012 ISSN 1096-1453 Volume 16, Issue 3

To cite, use print source rather than this on-line version which may not reflect print copy

format requirements or text lay-out and pagination.


This article should not be reprinted for inclusion in any publication for sale without author's explicit permission. Anyone may view, reproduce or store copy of this article for personal, non-commercial use as allowed by the "Fair Use" limitations (sections 107 and 108) of the U.S. Copyright law. For any other use and for reprints, contact article's author(s) who may impose usage fee.. See also electronic version copyright clearance    CURRENT VERSION COPYRIGHT © MMXII AUTHOR & ACADEMIC EXCHANGE QUARTERLY



Walk with Me: A Qualitative Research Journey


Sharon L. Moore, Athabasca University, Alberta Canada

Katherine J. Janzen, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Alberta


Moore, PhD is Associate Professor, Faculty of Health Disciplines at Athabasca University and Janzen, MN, is Assistant Professor, Faculty of Health and Community Studies at Mount Royal University, Alberta Canada



While there have been numerous textbooks written on qualitative research, providing experiential opportunities can assist students to ‘become’ qualitative researchers rather than  just ‘doing’ qualitative research.  Becoming a qualitative researcher can be a transformative process where the student is invited to “walk with” the instructor while learning.  Using invitational theory as a framework, the qualitative journey of an instructor and a Master’s nursing student are explored.  Strategies utilized are presented.


Qualitative research can be described as being both an art and a science. Teaching these two components can be challenging for educators. On one hand the “mastery of facts, philosophies and procedures are important [and necessary aspects of] qualitative inquiry” (McAllister & Rowe, 2003, p. 302). On the other hand educators are called upon to stimulate “analytic skills [which] require a degree of playfulness, [passion], engagement, and creativity” (p. 297).

 There have been numerous textbooks written on the subject of qualitative research  (Alvesson & Skoldberg, 2009; Butler-Kisber, 2010; Creswell, 2012; Liamputtong & Rumbold, 2008; Munhall, 2012; Richards & Morse, 2012).  These resources are chiefly prescriptive and represent the ‘doing’ of qualitative research. Text-based materials can become cold, lifeless, and flat if not infused with experiences which breathe life into course work. Providing the experiential aspects of qualitative research assists students in a potentially transformative process where they learn to ‘be’ qualitative researchers rather than to merely ‘do’ qualitative research (Glesne, 2011).

McAllister and Rowe (2003) suggest that teaching qualitative research is an endeavour that requires educating students in both “doing” and “being” (p. 296). It is proposed that a holistic learning experience consists of a melding of both ‘doing’ and ‘being.’ This experience can be mediated by educators who invite students to walk with educators in joint student-educator journeys to become qualitative researchers. Metaphorically this could represent the educator and student walking along a mountain trail—side by side. The student walks, not ahead of the educator nor behind the educator, but rather alongside the educator. In this way concepts, passion, and a sense of wonder can be taught and modeled which may sustain students as qualitative researchers past the confines of the course itself. The purpose of this paper is to describe strategies used to infuse both ‘being’ and ‘doing’ into qualitative research courses. Strategies utilized in two graduate research courses at a large, online university are presented.  Discussion of the merits of these strategies is illustrated through two perspectives: the educator who developed and taught the course content and a graduate student who took the course taught by the same educator.  Invitational theory provides a framework for the discussion. Implications which arise from the discussion are outlined. 


Invitational theory suggests that learning occurs in response to human interaction and is best achieved in the presence of trust, optimism, respect, and intentionality (Shaw & Siegel, 2010).  Further, the presence of all four elements results in learning environments which invite, nurture and support learners (Haigh, 2011). The educator purposefully ‘invites’ students (Chant, Roes, & Moss, 2009) and in essence says, “Walk with me.” The result is a milieu that is safe, caring, enhances wellbeing, increases confidence, and ultimately allows students to “see themselves as able, valuable, and responsible” researchers (Chohan, 2009; Hunter & Smith, 2007; Usher & Pajeres, 2006, p. 13). This type of learning milieu allows students a sense of freedom in not only expressing opinions, and ideas as unique individuals, but also allows experimentation with conceptions and resources in new ways by both educator and student (Hunter & Smith, 2007).  Through this students learn “playfulness, passionate engagement and creativity” (McAllister & Rowe, 2003, p. 297) as they explore, practice, exercise, and express their “thoughts, concerns, confusions, revelations, and insights” (p. 301). 

Beginnings: Two Perspectives

The Educator’s Perspective

Four years ago, I was charged with developing an online graduate course in health studies in a subject that I am passionate about, qualitative research. Traditionally, graduate courses in qualitative research provide instruction about design and method. As a teacher, I wanted to move beyond the content and somehow instil a passion for qualitative research in my graduate students. It is one thing to be able to cite the tenets of qualitative research. It is quite another to be engaged with the phenomenon of study in a way that incites passion and the development of skills of interpretation and meaning making. It is one thing to read about a particular method, data collection strategy or analytical approach, but again, it is quite another to carry it out. A goal for the course was to have students learn the theory but to come out of the course feeling like they had some skills in generating and analyzing data and a passion for understanding in a much deeper and more meaningful way.  Another goal for the course was to facilitate the students to “think qualitatively” (Richards & Morse, 2012, p. 15) and to really understand what it means to “think qualitatively”.

In a search of the literature on teaching qualitative research, an inspiring article that speaks to this very idea was located (McAllister & Rowe, 2003). McAllister and Rowe wrote about the importance of inspiring and engaging students to “learn not only the content and research skills required to conduct good qualitative research but also the art of qualitative research” (p. 296). In their article, they called attention to the skills of doing and being through a discussion of educational strategies. They noted that

being a qualitative researcher involves attributes such as compassion, passion, integrity, tolerance of ambiguity, willingness to play with

ideas, knowledge and inquiry, commitment to viewing the social

world from the viewpoints of the people being studied, valuing of

detail and willingness to inject something of themselves into the

research process and its outcomes. (pp. 296-297)



Inspired by some of the strategies identified by McAllister& Rowe, drawing on my own photography, experiences, and beginning with the metaphor of walking a path, the Advanced Qualitative Methods for Health Research course was born. Students were invited to “walk with me,” their professor, as we explored the landscapes of qualitative research together. Haight (2011) describes this approach as a ‘learning invitation’ “a courteous request to engage with education” (p. 306).

The Student’s Perspective

Taking my single undergraduate research course proved difficult. The concepts were difficult to grasp and I finished the course feeling I was a master of nothing. As I went on to engage in graduate studies there were significantly more required research courses. I took the first of three graduate courses and could describe my experience as learning a bit of everything and yet coming away with nothing substantial. I still failed to grasp the concepts of research in any meaningful way.  When I enrolled in the second research class, composed of two distinct sections of quantitative and qualitative research, I struggled through the quantitative research portion and wondered how I would fare in the qualitative section of the course. I simply felt lost. I still wasn’t grasping the concepts to any great extent and again experienced feeling that while I had an elemental knowledge of research, I was master of none of it. It had become a paradoxical situation to which I had no solution. 

 Meno’s paradox, which is encapsulated as the Socratic problem (Merleau-Ponty, 2005),  was certainly forefront as I tenuously began the qualitative section of the course. Upon reviewing the assignments for this last half of the course, I wondered how I would accomplish them. Even qualitative terminology was an enigma. I, as Meno, struggled with unanswered questions:

How will [I] set about looking for that thing, the nature of which is totally unknown to [me]? Which, among the things [I] do not know, is the one which [I] propose to look for? And if by chance [I] should stumble upon it, hw will [I] know that it is indeed that thing, since [I am] in ignorance of it? (p. 431)


It wasn’t until I started my last research class, Advanced Qualitative Methods for Health Research, that I was finally able to grasp the concepts. As Morse (1994) so aptly put, “the only way to learn to do ‘good’ work [was] to find a mentor who [would] teach [me] to think qualitatively” (p. 4, italics in original text).  Both ‘doing’ and ‘being’ were infused within the course parameters and the course came alive for me. From the very first unit of the course I felt as I had been invited to walk with my professor in a journey that can be described in no other way than simply magical. In the four months that we explored the qualitative terrain together I came to sincerely appreciate the gift of her presence and expertise.

While in an online classroom of 17, I felt as if I was personally being mentored. Learning became a creative enterprise and an expression of freedom to explore the various facets of qualitative research. The paths that we travelled together taught me to think in a new way—qualitatively. I began to interpret the world around me differently as I viewed learning through a qualitative lens. It was as if I had put on glasses which allowed the fuzziness of qualitative research to come into focus and I could ‘see’ for the very first time. 

 I completed the course energized, enthusiastic, and significantly more confident as I went on to prepare for my thesis. While I still wasn’t a master of qualitative research, I felt that I could ‘do’ qualitative research and ‘be’ a qualitative researcher. As a result of the creative teaching strategies of my professor, a passion for qualitative research was born that would be nurtured and sustained throughout and beyond my thesis work.    


Six strategies were utilized in developing and teaching qualitative research.  These strategies were incorporated throughout the online study guide that students used to work through their course (an online paced course running throughout a 15 week semester): (1) Invitations, (2) use of metaphor and photography, (3) Socratic questioning and online dialogue, (4) stories, (5) multimedia  and (6) creative assignments designed to stimulate thinking and develop skills.


An important aspect of teaching from my point of view as an educator is to create an environment that facilitates learning and that encourages a climate of trust and respect in which students feel comfortable entering the discussion, raising questions, and challenging viewpoints. In the first week of the course and prior to beginning the actual work of the course, I send a “letter” to my students with a photo of me, introducing myself, telling them a little about who I am, what they can expect from me as their teacher, my goals for them in the course.  I send a piece written by Robin Sharma called “Enjoy the Path not Just the Reward”. 

The first invitation is to walk with me throughout the next fifteen weeks and to enjoy and savour not just the reward that comes at the end of finishing a course, but the learning and growth that occurs in working towards their goal. As Sharma (1999) says

…the real value of setting and achieving goals lies not in the rewards

 you receive but in the person you become as a result of reaching

your goals. This simple distinction has helped me to enjoy the path

 of life while, at the same time, staying focused on meeting my

personal and professional objectives. (p. 82)


I then invite the students to introduce themselves, share a photo if they choose and to share something they would like the class to know about them. This simple strategy serves to “set the stage” for the kind of classroom I want to create and it gets the students involved in participating in a discussion forum within the first couple of days of the course. It also allows me as the course professor to show that I value students as individuals and it begins to create an online community of learners.  

Use of Metaphor and Photography

 Each course study guide is designed with a group of learning modules that guides the student throughout the semester. Each module was created using a photograph and metaphor to introduce and frame the unit’s study topic. For example, the metaphor of a tapestry and a photograph of a quilt is used to introduce the topic of “Issues of Design in Qualitative Research” noting that research, like is like a quilt Rearranging the pieces creates something new. In another course unit, a photograph of a difficult mountain path is used to illustrate the process of writing in qualitative research with the accompanying quote, “I learn by going where I have to go.” (Roethke, nd).

Socratic Questioning and Online Dialogue

Each week, the course study guide introduces the topic while the professor provides a contextual summary and invitation to the students to join an online dialogue by posing some questions designed to clarify concepts, probe assumptions, question and challenge viewpoints and perspectives, and at times to question the questions themselves. Examples of these kinds of questions are:

The online discussion forum for each unit is focused on dialogue and extending the discussion rather than just answering questions while the professor serves to monitor the discussion and to participate (judiciously) in the discussion or to add questions to challenge and extend the discussion.


As the course professor, I let the students know that I have my own program of research that continues to influence how I teach and how I am in the classroom. Stories from my own challenges and successes model for the students, the life of a researcher who not only ‘talks the talk’ but ‘walks the walk.’ For example, leaving an interview with a research participant who shared a powerful experience of how she struggled to find hope following the death of her son by suicide, impacted me profoundly as it generated the memories of losing a dear friend to suicide just one year prior. Sharing stories like this with the students opens up opportunities to talk about the role of the researcher and the influence of the data on the researcher and the researcher on the data. These experiences can serve to breathe life into concepts that the students are studying.


The use of multimedia strategies provides an interesting opportunity to tap into the creative processes and also provides another option for “infusing life” into a course. In adapting an idea from McAllister & Rowe (2003), I created a multimedia show using beautiful images of nature that I have photographed in countries around the world. This was set to some relaxing music and the students are invited to watch the show and respond to questions:

Of course it is easy to see how these questions can very easily provide “fodder” for the dialogue mill that allows the professor to guide the discussion around the major philosophical underpinnings and tenets of qualitative research.

Creative Assignments  

 In the course, assignments are structured in such a way as to help the student develop skills for generating and analyzing data, and “writing the story” (Glesne, 2011). Structure of the assignments allow for creativity in how the students approach each of these areas. For example, in the first assignment, students are asked to scan the popular press (for three to four weeks) and collect articles that reflect the health care of Canadians.  This assignment simulates the ‘working experience’ of qualitative researchers, as they collect raw data, and create reflexive and methodological journals of their activities and decisions along the way.

Using the data that they have compiled, they develop a coding scheme and code the data. Based on their coding scheme, they identify themes that represent the health of Canadians. The course professor can then use the variety of responses  that students take in addressing this first assignment to illustrate various aspects of qualitative research. Discussion on how students can examine the same topic but approach it very differently can generate dialogue on the contextual nature of qualitative research, how knowledge is constructed, multiple perspectives, how understanding can change over time, multiple truths, and how personal experience influences the lens through which the researcher views the world. This exercise forms the foundation for their second assignment.

The second assignment builds on this first assignment by then asking the student to ‘write the story’ based on their data, analysis, and interpretation of the data. Once again, what becomes evident is the variety of interpretations about the same topic based on how students conceptualize and respond to the task.

The third assignment is a little more traditional in that the students are asked to write an in depth paper on a qualitative method of their choice and to consider how it might be applied to a research question of interest to them. While this is a more traditional type of assignment, it invites the student to reflect and think about how a particular method might be relevant for his/her research question.


The Educator’s Perspective: Evaluating Strategies

As an educator, I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge (and learn from)  the feedback from students when thinking about my hopes for teaching qualitative research. To that end, it is important to provide some examples of how a range of students evaluated the impact of the courses on their own learning.

I want to say that this has been a fabulous course!! I have learned so many              useful things that it is difficult to pinpoint just one. Having said that, I      believe that the most useful thing that I have learned  is a beginning  

level of data coding.


I think that my biggest learning moment came progressively, but then all of

a sudden, I realized that I have so much to learn not only about my topic of

interest or my proposed methodology, but also about myself as a person, a

mother and a partner, a counsellor, and a novice researcher.


This is what learning is. You suddenly understand something you've

Understood  all your life, but in a new way.


The integration of theory and practical application has made this a tremendous experience for me.

Thank you for providing an environment where we can be open and honest. Professors are also key to my success in a course. Their participation and guidance helps to create a group or class dynamic which fosters interaction and participation.


Thank you for taking the time to not only truly teach us (yes...I am hitting on a theme here!) but also in sharing part of your story with us. The slide show exercise really gave me a time for reflection, and brought up some emotions and thoughts about myself. Truth is, I tend to bury myself in work to deal with hard things, and "tuck away" the emotions that are associated as I often feel I do not have the time. I should know better...working in mental health, I know the flood gates will eventually open up. 


I have often said that my biggest teachers are my students. How can you not get excited about what you do when you see evidence of the learning that students experience when you walk the path with them on their learning journey? It is them who inspire me to strive to be a better teacher and to find ways that will help them seek out and find answers to their questions.


In health care practice, practitioners participate with people through periods in their lives when they are joyful such as at the birth of a baby, but also at times when they may be most vulnerable such as during times of severe mental or physical illness and death. The world of qualitative research offers a myriad of opportunities to discover and understand the breadth and depths of such experiences through narrative, poetic, photographic, performative, hermeneutic and phenomenological forms of inquiry. Butler-Kisber (2010) discusses the “need for researchers to have access to transparent accounts of inquiry processes, on the one hand, to show rather than just tell and as a result to produce more trustworthy and credible accounts of thematic, narrative and arts-informed processes” (p. 149). As students learn and participate in these processes, they have the opportunity to add to the evolving nature of qualitative inquiry. Glesne (2011) says that

qualitative inquiry is a search that leads into others’ lives, your

discipline, your practice and yourself. You cannot be sure of

where you will end up, but you invariably get caught up in the

search and make steps forward…. True research does not end. Instead, it points the way for yet another search. (p. 274)

In walking the path with students through learning qualitative research, the teacher and students together come to the understanding that qualitative research can come full circle in understanding a phenomenon and that in coming full circle, your understanding increases, broadens and invites a continuing search for yet deeper knowing and understanding. Telling the story is always more complicated than just reporting the facts as you try to represent the experience of the research participants.    As T.S. Eliot once said “we shall not cease from exploration and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time” (Eliot, 1969, p. 145).

The Student’s Perspective:  Evaluating Strategies from an Invitational Framework

As a graduate student, some of the most meaningful learning was encapsulated in (1) the metaphors and photographs, (2) the multimedia slide show and (3) creative assignments. The metaphors and photographs which were positioned at the onset of each unit gave a continual invitation to participate as well as engage with the course materials, the professor and other students.  In this way, invitations were both student-generated and teacher-generated which is a hallmark of the invitational classroom (Usher & Pajeres, 2006). 

The multimedia slide show and the accompanying reflective questions and answers which were shared in the online forum created a positive classroom culture (Steyn, 2009).   Again, the invitation to participate was purposeful (Usher & Pajeres, 2006) and allowed for both private and public feedback. Chohan (2010) suggests that peers become mentors and collaborators as they become involved with each other and with the thinking that is shared. A sense of community was developed between professor and students—individually and collectively which was pivotal in maintaining an invitational classroom (Hunter & Smith, 2007; Chohan, 2010). As a result, wellbeing and confidence in the growing ability to be qualitative researchers was enhanced (Usher & Pajeres, 2006). 


The creative assignments were especially appreciated. An invitational milieu is characterized as being safe, and free from judgement and ridicule (Kronenberg & Strahan, 2010). Engaging in the ‘Heath of Canadians’ assignment demonstrated willingness on the part of my professor to encourage my creativity and  also ‘see’ what other students might not ‘see.’ I learned both by ‘doing’ and in a developing sense, by ‘being’ or having the opportunity to ‘become’ a qualitative researcher. For a time I became immersed in data collection, analysis and finally conveying the results of my research in a short paper.

This strategy was free from prescription (other than the directions given for the assignment) and encouraged experimentation with both the concepts of coding and interpreting the data (Hunter & Smith, 2007; Richards & Morse, 2012). For me, this was particularly meaningful when I interpreted the data totally different than any of my fellow students. I had developed an overarching theme and five subthemes from the data that I had collected from the media. I was deeply struck that the data would tell a ‘story’ and the themes represented what the data were ‘saying’ if the data could speak.  Instead of responding with conventions of a ‘right’ way to interpret the data, my professor instead probed deeper into how I developed the themes. This communicated caring and a genuine interest in me and my analysis which assisted in further developing an invitational environment (Hunter & Smith, 2007). This approach by the instructor created a “courteous and supportive educational habitat in which everyone flourishes” (Haigh, 2011, p. 305).

From this experience I learned that my personal expression of ideas and opinions were valued and encouraged as I experimented with the data in new ways (Chant, Moes & Ross, 2009; Hunter & Smith, 2007; Shaw & Siegel, 2010).  This reinforced the contextual nature of qualitative data and the presence of multiple realities. The experience allowed me to engage deeper with not only subsequent data as I continued to learn about qualitative research, but allowed a sense of freedom to explore and learn more without constraint or criticism. This initial experience paved the way for the passion of my professor regarding qualitative research to be transferred to me. In the transition from merely ‘doing’ qualitative research, I truly felt as if I was ‘being’ a qualitative researcher. I became transformed as a result of my experiences in that course. While the journey that my professor and I took together eventually became finished ‘for then’ as the course came to a close, it was very evident that my journeys ‘yet to be taken’ as a qualitative researcher had only just begun.


There are several implications that arise from the discussion related to qualitative teaching strategies. The foremost may be that educators and course designers in essence ‘become’ the cornerstone of any course development and delivery. By providing continual invitations to “walk with me” students that may otherwise experience feelings of being ‘lost’ within  the tenets and procedures of qualitative research, have continual opportunities to ‘walk’ the qualitative landscapes and mountains together with an experienced educator-guide. When students feel their skills related to ‘doing’ qualitative research are tenuous at best, the educator can guide students to the paths that have more sure footing. Positive feedback and encouragement may have a tremendous effect upon students in persevering through courses where qualitative research is introduced for the first time. 

Providing opportunities for creativity and freedom to explore landscapes through various strategies also may represent pivotal actions that educators can employ in engaging students.  Professors who are passionate about qualitative research can act as catalysts to infuse their own passion and excitement into their students. This may “inspire [students] and [help them] maintain an open mind” about qualitative research (McAllister & Rowe, 2003, p. 297; Richards & Morse, 2012).

 As students move through the processes of ‘doing’ qualitative research, it is posited that they can come to a point of ‘being’ where they can see themselves as  qualitative researchers, perhaps for the very first time. Metaphorically, reaching the summit of the mountain and together looking down upon the landscape below can assist students to engage in their own journeys past the confines of qualitative research courses. It has long been suggested that success begets success. Inviting students to “walk with me” has the potential to generate some of the greatest teaching and learning moments—for both students and educators.  Indeed, the landscape of qualitative research takes on new meaning (Munhall, 2012).



We have presented the experience of teaching and learning about qualitative research through ‘being’ and ‘doing’ from the perspective of student and teacher.  Through the creation of an online classroom environment, which drew on aspects of invitational theory that encouraged students and fostered self-belief in a supportive and caring environment, students were able to learn and experience both theoretical and experiential aspects of qualitative research.


The journey was not always easy but we can extrapolate from Glesne (2011)  and say that whether you are researching climbers in the Rocky Mountains, a village people in a mountain community in Nepal, or the lifestyle of climbers at Everest base camp, “you will never understand it all, but you will know where to look next, what new questions to ask, and what sense it might have for yourself and others” (p. 274). This is the journey of a qualitative researcher and the challenge of the qualitative research teacher. To assist students in realizing that as they come full circle in their research process back to where they have started from, they are invited to see it with news eyes and with increased and broadened understanding. This results in an invitation for a continuing search for yet deeper knowing and understanding (Moore, 2012). The idea of “walk with me” reflects the important process that students and teachers encounter in their qualitative research journeys.



Alvesson, M., & Skoldverg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Butler-Kisber, L. (2010). Qualitative inquiry: Thematic, narrative and arts- informed  perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Chant, R.H., Moes, R., & Ross, M. (2009). Curriculum construction and teacher empowerment: Supporting invitational education with a creative problem solving model. Journal of Invitational Theory & Practice. 15, 55-67. Retrieved from

Chohan, S.K. (2010). Whispering selves and reflective transformations in the internal dialogue of teachers and Students. Journal of Invitational Theory & Practice, 16, 10-28. Retrieved from

 Creswell, J.W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Eliot, T.S. (1969). The complete poems and plays 1909-1950. Orlando, FL: Brace   Jovanovitch, .

Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Haigh, M. (2011). Invitational education: Theory, research and practice. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(2), 299-309. DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2011.554115.

Hunter, M., & Smith, K.H. (2007). Inviting school success: Invitational education and the art  class.  Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 13, 8-15. Retrieved from

Kronenberg, J., & Strahan, D.A. (2010). Responsive teaching: A framework for inviting success with students who “fly below the radar” in middle school classrooms. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 16, 77-87. Retrieved from

Liamputtong, P., & Rumbold, J. (Eds). (2008). Knowing differently: Arts-based collaborative research methods. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

McAllister, M., & Rowe, J. (2003). Blackbirds singing in the dead of night?  Advancing the craft of teaching qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Education, 42(7), 296-303. Retrieved from

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005 ed.). Phenomenology of perception. New York. Taylor Francis e-library. Retrieved from

Moore, S.L. (2012). Advanced qualitative methods for health research.  Online graduate course. Athabasca: Athabasca University.

Morse, J.M. (1994). Qualitative research: Fact or fantasy? In J.M. Morse (Ed.). Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Munhall, P.L. (2012). Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (5th ed.).   Sudbury, MA: Jones Bartlett Publishing.

NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 9, 2011.

Roethke, T. (n.d.) The waking from Selected Poems of Theodore Roethke. Retrieved July 25, 2012 from

Richards, L. & Morse, J.M. (2012). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative  methods (3rd  ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sharma, R. (1999). Who will cry when you die? Toronto, Canada: Harper Collins.

Shaw, D.E., & Siegel, B.L. (2010).  Re-adjusting the kaleidoscope: The basic tenants of invitational theory and practice. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 16, 105-112.  Retrieved from

Steyn, T. (2009). Inviting schools in the United States of America and Hong Kong:  An appreciative inquiry. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 15, 4-18. Retrieved  from

Usher, E.L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Inviting confidence in school: Invitations as a critical source of the academic self-efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 12, 7-16. Retrieved from http://www.invitational   education. net/journal/index2.htm